![]() I'll see if we can make a list of what you'd lose, and explore warning writers about these at the correct moments.The process of refinancing will follow these typical steps: wdz as the backup format, that's the best compromise, so you can still see everything in your history if needed. wdz files can't be preserved, so writers would be more responsible for making their own backups, but that's always a good idea anyway and WS makes that pretty simple. And of course the infinite history of your document that WriterSolo stores in. For instance some basic concepts like inline Note or Outline lines (which don't appear in PDFs and this don't impact pagination) don't exist in. I think that's pretty reasonable, though it gets very granular because. ![]() fdx, especially in this mode, and warn them to either not do it or use. fdx so you're running into the kinds of issues like opening a CSV in Excel - you can save back to CSV, but you might lose info if you used more advanced features.īut what we should do is "just" detect when a writer is doing something that can't be saved back to. ![]() As you said, we'd need to be careful because features like multiple documents in the same project don't work in. That's a really interesting idea, as an option. Our goal is to always offer it as a free, complete, professional screenwriting solution! The way it serves our business is by getting more writers using our tools and providing us with feedback, and we have some B2B deals as well. If you're curious why WS is free, it's because we want to make screenwriting more accessible, and provide a complete ecosystem for everyone regardless of their ability to pay. I'd absolutely love to hear any disagreement to my assessment, so we can improve our free offering and help more writers! But just because WriterSolo is free, maybe there's a perception that it's more basic, which I don't believe is the case. I can certainly imagine someone preferring FD, it's a different product and I know they're trying to make it good, just like we're trying to do the best with ours. It also have a number of features FD doesn't last time I checked, like filtering to just one character's dialogue/scenes and editing them in-place (not just exporting to a new document), automatically finding ways to shorten your script, and providing meaningful statistics about your script. Genuine question: are you aware of anything missing in WriterSolo that makes it just for "basic" screenwriting? Our intention is to have all the notable features of Final Draft, though it certainly has a different take on some. I appreciate you mentioning WriterSolo, which my company created! No Sale of Copyrighted Material or Sharing of Confidential Material Posts Made by ( u/deleted) Accounts are Subject to Removal Observe Dedicated Weekly Threads for Loglines, Memes, Etc Provide Descriptive/Informative Titles for Posts Screenplays MUST be properly formatted/Do not post your film without the screenplay. No Contest, Coverage or Service AdvertisingĬomplaints About Paid Feedback Must Include Script and Evaluations No Socks, Trolls or Shitposting, Spam or Off-Topic Postsĭon't post personal blogs, personal websites, or unapproved self-promotion. WIKI: FAQS & FORMATTING INFO AND RESOURCESĭo not personally attack fellow redditors respect privacy, be encouraging, use your manners.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |